Physicist: A normal rainbow is created when light enters a water droplet, bounces once off of the far side, and comes back out.
Diamond “droplets” however don’t make rainbows. In order to get a rainbow that exists, and isn’t in a tiny ring right around the sun (where it’s drowned out), the light has to bounce three times inside the droplet. By then it’s so dim that it’s unlikely anyone could see it. But if you could: it would form an arc about 50° from the “anti-solar direction” (the direction exactly opposite the sun; where your shadow is). For comparison, an ordinary rainbow is an arc about 40° around the anti-solar direction. If it doesn’t make plenty of sense why a rainbow is angle-dependent, why not swing by the first rainbow post?
You can figure out where rainbows should be by thinking about how light bounces in a sphere and applying “Snell’s law” (named after the horrifically named “Willebrord Snellius“). Then you can figure out what direction the light will ultimately go by adding up how much it turns from each interaction.
Turn 1: When light enters the droplet it turns because of “refraction“. The exact amount is given by Snell’s gross-sounding law. If the index of refraction of the air is NA and the index of refraction of the water is NW, then: . It so happens that NA = 1 (well… 1.0003) and NW ≈ 1.3. NW is slightly different for different colors, which is ultimately what gives rise to rainbows. It takes a minute or two of pondering, but the light beam will turn to the right by an angle of . First, imagine that is zero, so the beam is pointing straight at the center of the drop. That’s a turn of angle (by opposite angles). Now increase and the amount of the turn decreases. .
Turn 2: Since the radius of the droplet is fixed, the path of the light and the radial lines form an isosceles triangle. There’s another ! Since the incoming and reflected angles have to be the same you get one more . If the beam were to have come straight back on itself that would’ve been a turn of 180°. But it falls short of that by . So, the second turn is to the right again by an angle of . If there are R reflections then the total turning angle will be .
Turn 3: Snell’s did-you-sneeze-or-are-we-talking-about-optics law works the same way forward and backward. That is; the angles are the same going in or coming out. So, turn 3 is also by an angle of .
The total angle, A, is the sum of the three turns: . Snell’s law can then be used to solve for :
So, the total turning angle is:
And allowing R reflections:
, by the way, mostly just describes where on the drop the light initially hits. In a second there’ll be a colorful graph that doesn’t make much sense. So consider this:
If a beam turns 180°, it’ll come right back at you. If it turns 120° it’ll form a 60° arc, and if it turns 240° it’ll still form a 60° arc. That’s a little confusing, so when you want to figure out how big a rainbow will be, quickly draw a picture to see what kind of angle the rainbow will make around the solar direction (toward the sun) or anti-solar direction (away).
Now check this out!
The index of diffraction is different for different materials, but it also changes for different colors of light (different frequencies). For water you can find them here. By graphing the total turning angle (vertical axis) vs. (horizontal axis) for several colors you can immediately see at what angle the rainbow will show up. In the graph above the red curve bottoms out lower than the other colors, so at 138° you’ll find red and nothing else. A little higher and you have mostly greens and not much else.
To see this, enlarge the picture above, get a pencil, and, holding it level, move it up the graph. You’ll notice that at various angles one color will be in contact with the top of the pencil for a far greater range than the other colors. Hence, at that angle a particular color will be far more common than the others.
In general, in these graphs, a rainbow will show up whenever there’s a minimum (for a maximum you’d need a really weird material that doesn’t follow Snell’s law). So, without graphing lots of colors, you can still spot the rainbow-angle where the curve hits a minimum.
So, here’s the curve for water turning-angle, alongside the curve for diamond (which has an index of refraction of about 2.4, but that depends on color too):
So: case closed. No diamond rainbows. But what about secondary rainbows?
You can bounce more than once inside of the droplet before coming out. Each time a beam of light hits the side of the droplet most of the light exits but some of it is reflected back in. One reflection gives you the standard rainbow, but two reflections gives you a second rainbow (hence: double rainbows).
Three reflections? Sure!
I got very stoked about this question. So for all you other backyard rainbow-and-math enthusiasts who want to figure out when and where rainbows will show up in different materials, here’s a list of some indeces of refraction, and the equation:
Where A is the turning angle, R is the number of reflections, ND is the index of refraction of the Droplets, and NS is the index of refraction of the Surrounding material. , again, isn’t terribly important. Graph it, look for a minimum, and figure out what angle in the sky that corresponds too.
By the way: did you know that Titan’s atmosphere is almost all nitrogen (N=1) and that it rains liquid methane (N=1.29)? Just saying.
I haven’t included anything about light intensity and reflection coefficients, but in general: three reflections is a bit much, and you can pretty much ignore what happens when is close to 90°.